Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc.

Investors that purchased the Company’s securities and have suffered a loss, please fill in transaction information below, or email to

Are you a current or former employee of the company?*YesNo


+Additional Purchases


+Additional Sales

If you prefer, you may submit your transaction information or comments/questions in the box below:

There is no cost or obligation associated with submitting your information. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, please submit your contact information and purchase information to participate in the putative class action.

We also encourage you to contact Lesley F. Portnoy of The Portnoy Law Firm, at 310.692.8883, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at, or by email at

If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

Joining the case through the Portnoy Law website enables investors to learn about their legal claims and take an active role in recovering their losses.

The Portnoy Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

Portnoy Law Firm
Lesley F. Portnoy, Esq.,
Office: 310.692.8883
1800 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067

The complaint claims that Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. (formerly known as Spartan Acquisition Corp. II) made false and/or misleading statements, and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the company did not have proper underwriting and risk assessment procedures for its contractor advance program; (2) the company did not have sufficient oversight and monitoring systems to detect bad debt related to the contractor advance program in a timely manner; (3) the company did not have effective internal controls for accounting and reporting of non-cash advance receivables; (4) as a result, the company would need to take a non-cash advance receivables impairment charge of over $30 million; and (5) due to these issues, the company’s statements about its business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.