Mobileye Global Inc.

Investors that purchased the Company’s securities and have suffered a loss, please fill in transaction information below, or email to info@portnoylaw.com.

Are you a current or former employee of the company?*YesNo

Purchases

+Additional Purchases

Sales

+Additional Sales

If you prefer, you may submit your transaction information or comments/questions in the box below:




There is no cost or obligation associated with submitting your information. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, please submit your contact information and purchase information to participate in the putative class action.

We also encourage you to contact Lesley F. Portnoy of The Portnoy Law Firm, at 310.692.8883, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.portnoylaw.com, or by email at info@portnoylaw.com.

If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

Joining the case through the Portnoy Law website enables investors to learn about their legal claims and take an active role in recovering their losses.

The Portnoy Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

CONTACT:
Portnoy Law Firm
Lesley F. Portnoy, Esq.,
www.portnoylaw.com
Office: 310.692.8883
1800 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
info@portnoylaw.com

As per the complaint, on January 4, 2024, Mobileye issued a press release revealing that it had discovered a surplus inventory situation, comprising an estimated 6-7 million units of EyeQ SoCs held by customers. Mobileye attributed this to supply chain challenges in 2021 and 2022, along with lower-than-expected production at certain OEMs in 2023. The company also acknowledged that these lower volumes in the EyeQ® SoC business would temporarily affect profitability. Furthermore, Mobileye provided a preliminary financial outlook for 2024, forecasting a roughly 50% decrease in Q1 revenue compared to the first quarter of 2023, which generated $458 million in revenue.

The plaintiff alleges that throughout the class period, the defendants did not disclose the following information to investors:

  1. The Company’s Tier 1 customers had purchased excess inventory during fiscal 2023 to prevent shortages, as experienced during supply chain constraints in 2021 and 2022.
  2. Consequently, the Company’s customers had accumulated surplus inventory, including approximately 6-7 million units of EyeQ SoCs.
  3. Due to this inventory buildup, there was a substantial risk that Tier 1 customers would reduce their product purchases, potentially adversely affecting the Company’s fiscal 2024 financial results.