Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.

Investors that purchased the Company’s securities and have suffered a loss, please fill in transaction information below, or email to info@portnoylaw.com.

    Are you a current or former employee of the company?*YesNo

    Purchases


    +Additional Purchases

    Sales


    +Additional Sales

    If you prefer, you may submit your transaction information or comments/questions in the box below:


    There is no cost or obligation associated with submitting your information. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, please submit your contact information and purchase information to participate in the putative class action.

    We also encourage you to contact Lesley F. Portnoy of The Portnoy Law Firm, at 310.692.8883, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.portnoylaw.com, or by email at info@portnoylaw.com.

    If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

    Joining the case through the Portnoy Law website enables investors to learn about their legal claims and take an active role in recovering their losses.

    The Portnoy Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

    CONTACT:
    Portnoy Law Firm
    Lesley F. Portnoy, Esq.,
    www.portnoylaw.com
    Office: 310.692.8883
    1800 Century Park East, Suite 600
    Los Angeles, CA 90067
    info@portnoylaw.com

    The complaint claims that, during the Class Period, the defendants misrepresented or failed to disclose several key issues, including: (i) that IAS was facing a new, significant trend of heightened competitive pricing pressures, forcing the company to lower prices to address weaker demand and slower revenue growth; (ii) that IAS’s pricing strategy was no longer advantageous and it could not maintain or raise prices as previously expected; (iii) that pricing had become a crucial factor in differentiating IAS from competitors, which was necessary to secure major renewals and new contracts; (iv) that the risks of increased competition leading to pricing pressures or forcing price changes had already materialized; and (v) as a result, IAS’s public statements during this period were materially false and misleading.