Nextracker Inc.

Investors that purchased the Company’s securities and have suffered a loss, please fill in transaction information below, or email to info@portnoylaw.com.

    Are you a current or former employee of the company?*YesNo

    Purchases


    +Additional Purchases

    Sales


    +Additional Sales

    If you prefer, you may submit your transaction information or comments/questions in the box below:


    There is no cost or obligation associated with submitting your information. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, please submit your contact information and purchase information to participate in the putative class action.

    We also encourage you to contact Lesley F. Portnoy of The Portnoy Law Firm, at 310.692.8883, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.portnoylaw.com, or by email at info@portnoylaw.com.

    If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

    Joining the case through the Portnoy Law website enables investors to learn about their legal claims and take an active role in recovering their losses.

    The Portnoy Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

    CONTACT:
    Portnoy Law Firm
    Lesley F. Portnoy, Esq.,
    www.portnoylaw.com
    Office: 310.692.8883
    1800 Century Park East, Suite 600
    Los Angeles, CA 90067
    info@portnoylaw.com

    Nextracker is a provider of software solutions and products that help solar panels track the sun’s movements across the sky to optimize the performance of utility power plants.

    The class action lawsuit against Nextracker claims that, during the Class Period, the defendants made false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose that: (i) the impact of project delays on Nextracker’s business, financial results, and future outlook was far worse than investors were led to believe; (ii) permitting and interconnection delays had significantly hindered Nextracker’s ability to convert its backlog into revenue at the historical rates it had promised; (iii) Nextracker was unable to offset the negative effects of project delays through increased client demand or by accelerating other projects, contrary to what was communicated by the defendants; (iv) Nextracker did not have the competitive advantages that supposedly protected it from industry-wide challenges or the ability to mitigate the adverse effects of project delays as claimed by the defendants; and (v) as a result, the defendants’ positive statements regarding Nextracker’s business, financial results, and future prospects were unsupported.

    The lawsuit further alleges that on August 1, 2024, Nextracker disclosed that its revenue had decreased sequentially, from $737 million in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2024 to $720 million in the first fiscal quarter of 2025. Similarly, Nextracker’s GAAP gross profit dropped from $340 million in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2024 to $237 million in the first fiscal quarter of 2025. Notably, Nextracker also failed to raise its guidance for the first time since becoming a public company, signaling a slowdown in growth for the remainder of the year. Following this announcement, Nextracker’s stock price fell by about 15% over two trading days.