AMMO, Inc.

Investors that purchased the Company’s securities and have suffered a loss, please fill in transaction information below, or email to info@portnoylaw.com.

Are you a current or former employee of the company?*YesNo

Purchases

+Additional Purchases

Sales

+Additional Sales

If you prefer, you may submit your transaction information or comments/questions in the box below:




There is no cost or obligation associated with submitting your information. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, please submit your contact information and purchase information to participate in the putative class action.

We also encourage you to contact Lesley F. Portnoy of The Portnoy Law Firm, at 310.692.8883, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.portnoylaw.com, or by email at info@portnoylaw.com.

If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

Joining the case through the Portnoy Law website enables investors to learn about their legal claims and take an active role in recovering their losses.

The Portnoy Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

CONTACT:
Portnoy Law Firm
Lesley F. Portnoy, Esq.,
www.portnoylaw.com
Office: 310.692.8883
1800 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
info@portnoylaw.com

Following this news, the company’s share price dropped by $0.08, or 5.26%, closing at $1.44 per share on September 25, 2024, amid unusually high trading volume.

The class action complaint claims that during the Class Period, the Defendants made significant false and misleading statements and failed to reveal important negative information about the company’s business and future prospects. Specifically, the Defendants allegedly did not inform investors about: (1) the company’s inadequate internal controls over financial reporting; (2) the likelihood that it did not accurately disclose all executive officers, management members, and potential related party transactions from fiscal years 2020 to 2023; (3) the possibility that the company mischaracterized certain fees for investor relations and legal services as reductions in capital raise proceeds rather than as expenses in fiscal years 2021 and 2022; (4) the likelihood that it improperly valued unrestricted stock awards to officers, directors, employees, and others from fiscal years 2020 to 2022; and (5) that, due to these issues, the Defendants’ positive statements regarding the company’s business and outlook were misleading and lacked a solid foundation.